send mail
  • Dutch contract law
    • Contract law in the Netherlands
      Dutch contract law
      Precontractual liability in the Netherlands
      Acceptance under Dutch contract law
      Battle of forms under Dutch law
      Nullity and annulment of a contract
      Contract error under Dutch law
      Joint liability under Dutch law
      Surety agreements
      Contents of a contract
      Reasonableness and fairness
      General terms under Dutch law
      Penalty clauses under Dutch law
      Assignment of a claim
      Actio Pauliana under Dutch law
      Contract interpretation
      Performance, breach, remedies
      Breach under Dutch contract law
      Force majeure
      Termination for breach
      Exemption clauses
      Limitation of actions
      Corona and contracts
      Types of contract under Dutch law
      Licenses under Dutch law
      Franchise under Dutch law
      Sale of Goods under Dutch law
      Lease under Dutch law
      Commercial Agency under Dutch law
      Distribution contracts
  • Dutch employment law
    • Employment law in the Netherlands
      Dutch employment law - 101
      Employment attorney
      Non-competition
      Non-compete clause
      Employment probation period
      Employment trial period
      Employment contract under Dutch law
      Employment duration
      Fixed-term and permanent
      Employment termination
      Termination of employment
      Ways to terminate employment
      Employment contract termination
      Employee termination
      Termination by mutual consent
      Dismissal of an employee
      Dismissal procedures
      Dismissal of an ill employee
      Summary dismissal under Dutch law
      Dismissal protection under Dutch law
      Dismissal payment in the Netherlands
      Employment law - miscellaneous
      Obligations of employers
      Sick pay
      Dutch employment lawyer
      Dutch works councils
      Business reorganization
      Collective redundancy
      Dutch freelance contracts
      Recruitment agency contracts
  • Litigation
    • Court proceedings in the Netherlands
      Litigation in the Netherlands
      Dutch legal proceedings
      Civil proceedings in the Netherlands
      NCC - Commercial Court proceedings
      Appeals in the Netherlands
      Decisions & rulings
      Preliminary relief in Dutch law
      Freezing orders in the Netherlands
      Remedies in Dutch litigation
      Conservatory arrest of assets
      Limitation periods in Dutch law
      Jurisdiction & scope
      Dispute resolution under Dutch law
      Jurisdiction of the NCC
      Personal jurisdiction of the NCC
      Arbitration in the Netherlands
      Costs & claims
      Debt collection in the Netherlands
      Commercial debt colection
      Debt collection compliance
      Consumer rights in debt recovery
      Cross-border debt recovery
      Claiming damages under Dutch law
      Extrajudicial costs under Dutch Law
      Costs of litigation in the Netherlands
  • Dutch lawyers
    • Best litigation, ICT & IP lawyers
      Best litigation lawyers in the Netherlands
      Best employment litigation lawyers
      Best ICT lawyers in the Netherlands
      Best IP lawyers in the Netherlands
      Best family lawyers in the Netherlands
      Best divorce lawyers in the Netherlands
      Best business and employment lawyers
      Best business lawyers in the Netherlands
      Best corporate lawyers in the Netherlands
      Best contract lawyers in the Netherlands
      Best M&A lawyers in the Netherlands
      Best labour lawyers in the Netherlands
      Best dismissal lawyers in the Netherlands
      Best Dutch immigration lawyers
      Finding & hiring a lawyer in the Netherlands
      Choosing a lawyer in the Netherlands
      Finding a Dutch employment lawyer
      Lists of lawyers in the Netherlands
      Hiring a Dutch attorney
      Resources about Dutch lawyers
      Dutch Bar Association
      Ranking litigation attorneys
      Top ranked civil litigation lawyers
      About lawyers in the Netherlands
  • About us
  • Contact us

Actio Pauliana under Dutch law - creditor protection in the Netherlands

  • Dutch law
  • Contract law
  • Actio Pauliana under Dutch law

How are creditors protected under the laws of the Netherlands?

Annulment of prejudicial contracts - creditor protection in the Netherlands

Under Dutch law, a basic principle is that third parties must respect contracts to which they are not a party, even if they are prejudiced by these contracts. However, there are certain situations in which creditors are entitled to object and potentially annul contracts or legal acts entered into by the debtor.

The Dutch Civil Code states that if a debtor performs a legal act to which he was not obliged, whilst he knew (or ought to have known) that this act would adversely affect the recourse of his creditors, the act may be annulled (art 3:45 DCC). An example is where a debtor transfers his assets to third party to put them out of reach of his debtors.


What is the actio pauliana under Dutch law?

Any creditor, whose recourse has been adversely affected by the act of a debtor, may seek to annul that act, irrespective of whether the claim of the creditor arose before or after the act in question. According to the Dutch Civil Code, for a successful annulment by a creditor, it is required:

  • that the debtor knew (or ought to have known) that prejudice to the creditor would result from the act, and
  • that that the persons with whom such a debtor performed the legal act, must have had the same knowledge (that the legal act would prejudice creditors of the other party).

When can you annul a gratuitous legal act under Dutch civil law?

If the legal act in question is performed based on a gratuitous title e.g. a gift, the knowledge of debtor alone is sufficient to annul the legal act. For example, if the debtor gifted his assets to a friend to put them out of reach of his creditors, it is not necessary that the friend was aware that this act would prejudice the creditors of the debtor. However, the annulment of a gratuitous legal act will only affect the rights of the beneficiary if and to the extent that he knew or ought to have known that the rights of creditors would be adversely affected, provided that the beneficiary proves that he was not benefiting from the legal act at the time that the claim for annulment was made.


What are the effects of annulment on the basis of the actio pauliana under Dutch law?

Under Dutch law, the effect of annulment of a legal act by a prejudiced creditor, is only relative. The creditor can only seek annulment to the extent that his interests have been harmed, and the annulment has no effects beyond what is strictly necessary to remedy the adverse effects to the creditor.

The implication of this is that the legal act remains valid against all other creditors. However, rights acquired by third parties by virtue of an annulled legal act (other than gratuitous acts), are not affected by such an annulment. With regard to a third party who has acquired property in good faith, based on a gratuitous title, an annulment by a prejudiced creditor has no effect to the extent that this third party shows that he has not as yet derived profit from the legal act at the time the property is claimed from him.


What are the actio pauliana presumptions under Dutch law?

Under Dutch law, a creditor who seeks to annul a prejudicing legal act by his debtor, must prove (among other things) the knowledge of the debtor of the prejudice and (in case the legal act was not performed based on a gratuitous title) also of the parties with whom the debtor performed the legal act. In practice this onus of proof is difficult to fulfil for creditors. In order to alleviate the onus on prejudiced creditors, the Dutch Civil Code contains a number of (rebuttable) presumptions with regard to the knowledge (of both parties).

There is a statutory (rebuttable) presumption that, if such a prejudicing act has been performed within one year prior to invoking the annulment, both sides know (or ought to have known) that prejudice to a creditor or creditors would be the result of the juridical act.

Examples (not exhaustive) of where the presumption applies:

  1. where the debtor has entered into a contract where there is a significant imbalance in consideration
  2. where the debtor pays or provides security for an obligation that is not yet owed, e.g. a debt that has not yet fallen due
  3. where a legal act had been performed with a number of certain persons, such as family members of the debtor or (if the debtor is a legal entity) the debtor’s officers, directors or shareholders, and their relatives.

In the event of prejudice caused by a legal act based on gratuitous title, performed within one year prior to invoking the annulment, the Dutch Civil Code regulates that there is a (rebuttable) presumption that he knew, or ought to have known, that prejudice to one or more creditors would be the result of such a legal act.


Actio pauliana in cases of insolvency

In case of insolvency, the Dutch Bankruptcy Act gives the official receiver in insolvency the right to invoke annulment if the person who is declared insolvent sought (prior to being adjudicated insolvent) to remove his assets in order to prevent recourse by the official receiver. It is possible for the liquidator to annul both obligatory and non-obligatory transactions. An obligatory transaction is one that the debtor was under an existing obligation to enter into. For example, an obligation to provide additional security upon request from the bank based on the existing arrangements with the bank. The requirements for annulment will depend on whether the legal act was obligatory or not.

The statutory provisions relating to insolvency also contain presumptions to assist the creditor is establishing the requisite knowledge of the debtor (and other parties).


Under Dutch law, can you challenge transactions entered into by a debtor?

Under Dutch law, the actio pauliana allows a creditor to challenge transactions that have been entered into by a debtor that have the effect of minimising the creditor’s recourse. Please note: there is also an actio pauliana doctrine that applies where the debtor is insolvent.


Jan Willem de Groot - lawyer in the Netherlands
June 20th, 2024

About the author

Dutch lawyer in the Netherlands - Jan Willem de Groot

Jan Willem de Groot has been a lawyer in the Netherlands for 35 years. He is now an author and speaker on Dutch civil law. As a Dutch lawyer, his main areas of expertise are contract law and litigation in the Netherlands.


Lawyers in the Netherlands
Lawyers in the Netherlands
Lawyer in The Netherlands Ranking Dutch attorneys Choosing a Dutch lawyer Hiring a Dutch attorney
List of lawyers in the Netherlands
List of lawyers in the Netherlands Top Dutch civil litigation lawyers
Netherlands Bar
Dutch Bar Association

Dutch contract law
Dutch law of contracts
Precontractual liability Acceptance of an offer Battle of forms under Dutch law Mistake in Dutch contract law Nullity of an agreement Joint and several liability Liability of the Surety
Contents of a contract
Reasonableness and fairness General terms under Dutch law Liquidated damages Assignment of a claim Prejudicial Dutch contracts Interpretation of contracts
Performance, breach, remedies
Breach of contract Acts of God under Dutch law Corona and Dutch contracts Contract termination for cause Damage claims under Dutch law Restriction of liability Statute of limitations
Contract law - miscellaneous
Licences under Dutch law Franchises in the Netherlands Contracts of sale under Dutch law Dutch rental agreements Commercial agents in Holland Distribution contracts in Holland

Dutch employment law
Employment contract law
Dutch employment law Non-competition Non-competition clauses Probation period Trial periods Dutch employment contract Employment duration Fixed-term and permanent
Employment termination
Termination of employment Employment contract termination Dismissal procedures Employee termination Termination by mutual consent Dismissal of an ill employee Summary dismissal Dismissal protection Dismissal payment
Employment -miscellaneous
Obligations of employers Sick pay Dutch employment lawyer Works council Business reorganization Collective redundancy Dutch freelance contracts Recruitment agency contracts

Litigation in Holland
Legal Proceedings
Legal proceedings Debt collection Dutch limitation periods Preliminary relief Freezing orders Court proceedings Appeal proceedings Remedies under Dutch law
Arbitration
Arbitration in the Netherlands
Information about this website? Send mail.
Terms of use and privacy policy:

The content provided on www.dutch-law.com is offered by the Dutch Law Institute for general information purposes only.
It cannot deal with the specific details of any particular situation ... [read more]

Address:
Dutch Law Institute
Beethovenstraat 124-3
1077 JR Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Telephone:

+31 65224 2503

Hours:

Monday 9am–5pm
Tuesday 9am–5pm
Wednesday 9am–5pm
Thursday 9am–5pm
Friday 9am–5pm
Saturday Closed
Sunday Closed

Dutch Law Institute
  • About the Dutch Law Institute
  • Dutch Law Intitute on LinkedIn
  • Netherlands employment law
Published by the Dutch Law Institute - edited by Jan Willem de Groot, lawyer in the Netherlands - © 2021 - 2025, Dutch Law Institute | Sitemap [XML]